User talk:NearEMPTiness

TUSC token 970e4a6a3604a4de64227b334d4ac70e

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museumsbahnsteig Oberhausen - Gießpfanne und historischer Zug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 18:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear NearEMPTiness,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Deutschland

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo NearEMPTiness,

etwas spät, aber noch nicht zu spät, möchte ich dir hiermit, pünktlich zum Nikolaus, im Namen der Juroren das Goldene Gummibärchen für deine erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments überreichen.

Dein Preisträgerfoto ist...
Platz 9

Ich hoffe dir hat der Wettbewerb mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet wie uns. Sehen wir dich 2014 wieder?

Einen besinnliches Adventswochenende und viel Erfolg im nächsten Jahr wünscht dir,
Anika (talk) 08:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wende Dich für den Preis bitte an community@wikimedia.de. Grüße --Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 12:52, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

um

Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Are you sure that your work here is an improvement? Look at all that artifacting. DS (talk) 01:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also, I strongly recommend archiving your old messages. You have so many on here that it breaks the page parser. DS (talk) 01:50, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@DS: Thanks for your comments. Please feel free to revert my edits, if the originals look better on your screen. I noted your photos, because they needed a category since 2019. On my screen, the originals were displayed with a purple haze. I tried to edit them using GIMP, but I am not fully haopy with the results. Thus, feel free to revert, as you are the original uploader. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 02:24, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

After having seen the photos on another screen, I have reverted them to the originals. I have asked the German photo workshop to upload retouched versions with a new file name each. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Pacific Motorway, Springwood, Queensland.jpg
File:Pacific Motorway, Daisy Hill, Queensland.jpg

File:In memory of Marquette passengers (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:In memory of Marquette passengers (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Motacilla (talk) 20:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:DEBARCADERE.jpg

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. You added a category to this image File:DEBARCADERE.jpg (I took it back). Why do you think this image was taken in Geneva (Switzerland)?!?! It doesn't look like. MHM (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@MHM Thank you very much for your vigilance and useful action. I found the photo of "Débarcadère Perle du Lac", and did not understand that Débarcadère is just a French word for landing stage or pier. I fully agree that the photo has been taken more likely in Mauritius as the other uploads of this photographer. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:11, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Categories, because of misleading file-name (resolved)

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What let's you assume that this lake is in Kodaikanal, let alone in India. When I deleted the categories, I should have also renamed the filename, because that is the only association with Kodaikanal. But as these file-names show Von Govindaraj Mahalakshmi hochgeladene Dateien – Wikimedia Commons, they are indeed only personal associations. This is not in Kodaikanal. No Watermill there, Different architecture, different landscape, clothing of fisherman. Wuselig (talk) 22:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dear Wuselig: Thank you very much for your help. My assumption is only based on the name in the title of this photo. The wrong category was chosen as part of categorising 100,000 or more photos. Please re-categorise and re-name the photo as good as you can, or just remove the wrong category. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 00:35, 17 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ed_Keller

Latest comment: 18 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ed Keller has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 13:16, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:East_Pakenham_railway_station

Latest comment: 10 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

East Pakenham railway station has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- numbermaniac (talk) 14:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Benzol-Lokomotive an der Front des Ersten Weltkriegs.jpg

Latest comment: 10 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why is the link already dead? Did you got the URL wrong? Trade (talk) 00:12, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

User:Trade: Most likely, the link can only be opened by members of the facebook group "Feldbahnfotos." I added another link. Both links can be easily opened on my computer. NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Benzin-elektrischer Generatorwagen Nr. 128.jpg

Latest comment: 10 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Benzin-elektrischer Generatorwagen Nr. 128.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Trade (talk) 00:23, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tne correct licence is {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:42, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Saran ( Sand ) Shark.jpg

Latest comment: 10 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Saran ( Sand ) Shark.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aftokrator (talk) 01:51, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Kartenzusammensetzung

Latest comment: 9 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Guten Abend NearEMPTiness ich habe mal wieder ein Anliegen an dich um komplettere historische Pläne für Commons und Wikipedia zu erzeugen.
Teil 1
Bitte die beiden Karten zur Datei Topographische Karte LGV BAY Kaiserwinkel 1959 zusammensetzen und in die Cats Kaiserwinkel und Old maps of the Tyrol einsetzen.

Teil 2
Bitte die beiden Berchtesgaden-Teil-Uraufnahme-Blätter zusammensetzen und in die Cat Old maps of Berchtesgaden einsetzen.

Wäre dir sehr dankbar wenn du das möglich machen könntest, herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 15:36, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ricardalovesmonuments: Schön, mal wieder von Dir zu hören. Schau bitte mal, ob Du Dir das so vorgestellt hast:

File:LVG BAY Kaiserwinkel West und Ost 1959.jpg

Uraufnahme Ortsblatt Ort Ber 1853 B19-1-2 und 1-3 Landkreis Berchtesgadener Land Oberbayern (stitched)

--NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:39, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ja danke, genauso hatte ich es mir vorgestellt, an der Berchtesgaden-Karte füre ich dann noch eine Farbkorrektur durch. Herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 19:49, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Howrah railway junction.jpg

Latest comment: 7 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Howrah railway junction.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Bodhisattwa (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:500px photo (53002120).jpeg

Latest comment: 5 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:500px photo (53002120).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 11:12, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Weitere Kartenzusammenfügung

Latest comment: 23 hours ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Guten Abend @NearEMPTiness ich habe noch einen weiteren Wunsch an dich in dieser Hinsicht, da @Georgfotoart einen noch komplexeren Auftrag als diesen gerade für mich ausführt. Im onbac der Nationalbibliothek Wien habe ich eine detailreiche topographische Karte von einem Teil der Steiermark aus dem Jahr 1899 gefunden, das ist für Österreich ungewöhnlich, da die meisten von ab etwa 1900 trotz des Alters Urheberrecht besitzen. Diese wurde in 4 Teilbereiche eingescannt, diese habe ich in guter Auflösung heruntergeladen, zurechtgeschnitten und einer Farbkorrektur unterzogen, und anschließend in der Category:Old maps of Styria unter dem gemeinsamen Dateititel Die Ennsthaleralpen, die Umgebung von Admont und der Gstatterboden im Gesäuse (1899 … hochgeladen. Könntest du bitte wieder zusammenfügen was zusammengehört? Herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 19:16, 16 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ricardalovesmonuments Vielen Dank für die interessante Aufgabenstellung. Ich habe die vier Dateien gefunden und werde nächste Woche mal prüfen, ob sich das mit GIMP machen lässt. Möglicherweise, reicht mein Arbeitsspeicher für so große Dateien nicht aus, aber ich muss ja voraussichtlich nichts verzerren. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:24, 17 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ricardalovesmonuments Ich habe inzwischen einen ersten Versuch hochgeladen. Nur das südöstlichste Blatt habe ich ein ganz kleines bisschen verbreitert. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:32, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Archive

TUSC token 970e4a6a3604a4de64227b334d4ac70e

Quality Image Promotion

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Deutschland

um

File:In memory of Marquette passengers (cropped).jpg

File:DEBARCADERE.jpg

Wrong Categories, because of misleading file-name (resolved)

Category:Ed_Keller

Category:East_Pakenham_railway_station

File:Benzol-Lokomotive an der Front des Ersten Weltkriegs.jpg

File:Benzin-elektrischer Generatorwagen Nr. 128.jpg

File:Saran ( Sand ) Shark.jpg

Kartenzusammensetzung

File tagging File:Howrah railway junction.jpg

File:500px photo (53002120).jpeg

Weitere Kartenzusammenfügung