User talk:Jon Kolbert
Add topic
|
![]() |
File:Woeful window would welcome wandering washer (26506467925).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Omphalographer (talk) 02:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Vancouver (11650903035).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:29, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Dear Jon, are you an admin?
I note that you speedy deleted this file, whilst it was under review at a still-open DR. A DR which has now closed as a keep. That raises concerns on several levels: Why was speedy deletion appropriate? Why was deletion necessary during an open (and somewhat problematic) DR? Finally, are you even an admin? You fly a flag as a steward, so technically you had the permissions to do this, but do you have the community's backing for such admin actions, in a situation that certainly didn't require steward-level interactions? Andy Dingley (talk) 22:53, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, they are an admin since Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jon Kolbert. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- The file in question met the criteria for speedy deletion and was deleted under that applicable policy. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:40, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- But why subvert an already-running DR? What justifies getting the admin supervote out for such a trivial file? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:07, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:14, 5 July 2025 (UTC)